Coding Geekette

100% girl geek, all the time

By the Community, For the Community…?

While reading on Twitter, I saw this post:


#dddsw DDD South West 3 Call For Speakers closes in 2 days time (Tuesday) http://bit.ly/hHW555less than a minute ago via TweetDeck Favorite Retweet Reply

Being active in Cleveland’s technical community and in the Heartland District, I’m always curious to see what other communities are doing. I had seen DDD references before from some of the people I follow, so I figured I’d check out DDD South West. While the Developer Developer Developer! conference sounds cool, their call for speakers makes me wonder.

Here are the requirements for 60 minute sessions:

  • You must be resident in the UK/Ireland or an active member of the UK/Ireland community
  • You must not be a Full Time Employee of Microsoft (DDD South West is “By The Community, For The Community”)
  • Your session must not promote a non-Microsoft commercial product/service if you work for or are directly associated with the company/organisation that sells the product/service (unless there is a free version and your presentation is primarily about the free version)

It seems odd that DDD South West is excluding Full Time Employees of Microsoft (and only Microsoft) from submitting talks. Sure, they go on to say that the session shouldn’t promote a non-Microsoft commercial product or service either. But really… why are they going so far as to explicitly say no Microsoft FTEs? And why do they go on to say “By The Community, For The Community” after saying that Full Time Employees of Microsoft can’t submit talks? Are Microsoft employees not allowed to be a part of the community? This just doesn’t make sense.

It seems fairly assinine to say “You must not be a Full Time Employee of {insert a company name here}” and then say “By The Community, For The Community”. Are people who work for companies not allowed to be a part of the community? Is there something about a particular company’s FTEs that really would need to exclude them from a community?

What kills me even more is that they link to Scott Hanselman as a resource to check out on “how to present in public”. Did they not get the memo that Scott is a FTE of Microsoft? Oh yeah… and Microsoft is a sponsor backing this behavior? What the…? Again, that just doesn’t make sense.

What a confusing message to send to potential website visitors. :(

2 Comments »

The Adventures of Book Writing, Part 2

This is a continuation of The Adventures of Book Writing.

So how long did it take to write the book?

I wrote my parts from October 2010 through February 2011.  There were some weeks where I would write 2-3 hours/day for 2-3 days/week.  But then there were also some weeks when I wouldn’t write (like when I was at CodeMash in January 2011).  There were a few weekends in there where I would put 6-8 hour days in writing/editing/taking screenshots/working on layout.

What was the thing you liked the least about the process?

I didn’t like feeling like a newbie to the process.  There were some times when I didn’t understand how things worked and would get frustrated that they weren’t how I imagined.  But despite those minor hurdles, it was a fairly smooth going process for me.

What was the thing you liked the best about the process?

I was privileged to work with a great co-author and an awesome team of editors.  Matt had written a book before for Sybex, so he knew a bit of what we were dealing with.  He warned me of what I might get into, but at the same time, he didn’t try to scare me out of it.  Jay Wren served as my tech editor, as Jay is into programming languages much like me and has a “tell it like it is” attitude that I really appreciated.  The other editors included an acquisitions editor, developmental editor, managing editor, production editor, and probably some other editors I don’t even know about.  There were many eyes that looked on this book, with many decades of experience. It was great to have them shepherd us through the whole writing/publishing process.

Did you prefer tech editing or writing?

I honestly spent more time tech editing than writing, but there’s no way to say that I prefer one over the other.  I enjoyed tech editing the main chapters of the book, as it forced me to keep my IT roots fresh and really had me trying things out.  Tech editing required me to tap into all of my technical background – including correcting a complex example to something much shorter thanks to my Unix/Linux familiarity.

As for writing, I enjoyed writing on the appendices. Because I knew that the audience for our book included IT professionals who may not have as much developer experience, I tried to keep the developer sections simple enough so that even they could follow them.

The important question… would you do it again?

I would definitely write again, and I would definitely tech edit again.  However, it’d take a bit to get me to do both on the same book.  I wouldn’t tech edit and write at the same time as much as I did on this book.  I’d write or tech edit, but the only way I’d do both on a book is if my writing obligation was smaller or if my tech editing obligation was smaller.

And because I’m hearing this already…

I pre-ordered your book.  Can I get your autograph?

Absolutely!  If I’m at a local user group or community event, I’ll sign your copy of Automating Windows Server 2008 R2 with Windows PowerShell 2.0!

No Comments »